They delivered poor quality code, according to an engineer from another reliable vendor. They utilized inline CSS, which no professional developer uses. We requested a responsive app, but the engineer that assessed the code demonstrated that it was not. They set us back three months and took one-third of the total payment for a worthless deliverable.
While crashes and errors impair user experience and cause losses, wrong decisions at the architecture planning and decision-making stage can ruin the project's long-term survival. Security, compatibility, and integration issues undermine the possibilities of future growth and scaling. They become a significant budget drain and can sink a successful startup once it starts growing.
Custom software development projects hinge on the decisions of the team lead. He or she should possess the expertise necessary to make critical decisions, but offshore outsourcing IT vendors cannot afford to keep more than one or two specialists of this caliber. As a result, they are torn between a dozen different projects and do not have the time to assess all possibilities and make the best decisions. Technological knowledge
gaps concerning current best practices and industry-standard solutions are directly connected to the lack of senior-level developers. With no time to handle multiple projects simultaneously, they do not have an opportunity for research, studies, and professional growth vital in a dynamic field of software development services.
The worst-case scenario is paying for the services of the senior-level developer who does not have the time or skills to benefit your project. It is the core of multiple problems of outsourcing and is the risk you have to take if you are on a budget. However, some options can help you improve the chance of fair play: